One of the biggest problems we face in teaching photosynthesis is that students often do not quite make the connection between this process and "real" carbohydrates such as table sugar and corn starch. How can a gas and some water give you a solid? We, as educators, have already made the leap of faith; our students have not.
There is a lot of good history connected with photosynthesis, and thus many opportunities to explore what people used to think and how the scientific method helped us arrive at our present knowledge of this subject. In addition to the names mentioned in text, some other historical names worth exploring include:
You might wish to copy and distribute to your students the Overview of Chapter Objectives flowchart found at the beginning of this Instructor's Manual Chapter.
In the General Tips I posed the question: How can a gas and some water give you a solid? This would be a good question to ask your class as you begin to teach photosynthesis. Or, another question: What would happen if you set a bucket of water in direct sunlight and then bubbled pure carbon dioxide through it?
The Mastering Concepts questions in this chapter are especially good for students who are having trouble with the different components of photosynthesis. You might consider assigning these (or similar) questions for the students to complete before you lecture on the topic. Your lecture will then become both a method of pulling it all together and an opportunity for the students to ask questions about specific points of confusion.
Table 8.3 is excellent for comparing the different types of photosynthesis. Consider adding this question to the bottom of each column: Where would you find a plant using this type of photosynthesis and why is this type of photosynthesis the most efficient for this plant's particular circumstances?
Table 8.4 is a good summary of the factors controlling photosynthesis.
Stress that the oxygen generated in photosynthesis comes from the splitting of the water and that the water generated in photosynthesis is new water.
Biology in Action 8.1 affords an excellent opportunity to examine both the history of an idea and the scientific method in action. As stated, van Helmont concluded the increase in plant matter was due to the plentiful water. He also concluded he had made an error in measurement. In addition, van Helmont (1577-1644) demonstrated that plants do not have the same nutritional needs as animals.
As another sidelight on this section, note that the percentage of oxygen in the atmosphere has been fluctuating for many millions of years.
feedback form |
permissions |
international |
locate your campus rep |
request a review copy
Copyright ©2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies.
digital solutions |
publish with us |
customer service |
mhhe home
Any use is subject to the
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
McGraw-Hill Higher Education is one of the many fine businesses of the
The McGraw-Hill Companies.