Indicate whether you agree or disagree with each statement.

  1. There is nothing wrong with human cloning, since human clones exist in nature in the form of twins or triplets.


    2. Agree Disagree

  2. During cloning procedures, the destruction of the inner cell mass is unethical since it interferes with the rights of the embryo to live, thus cloning should always be banned.


    3. Agree Disagree

  3. Cloning of embryos is acceptable for the treatment of disease but clones should not be allowed to develop further.


    4. Agree Disagree

  4. Human suffering has always occurred and will likely always occur; therefore the argument to clone humans in order to alleviate suffering is meaningless.


    5. Agree Disagree

  5. Cloning of humans is acceptable as long as the clones are not used for organ or tissue donation.


    6. Agree Disagree

  6. Under no circumstances should humans be cloned; the current ban on human cloning should continue forever.


    7. Agree Disagree

  7. A human cloned using biotechnology is not equal to a human conceived naturally, therefore cloning should be allowed.


    8. Agree Disagree

  8. A human is a human regardless of how it is conceived or produced; cloning should be not be allowed since its purpose is mainly for therapeutic use of the clones.


    9. Agree Disagree

  9. Animals frequently spontaneously abort embryos in nature; humans are animals, thus human embryos should not receive the same status as free-living individuals.


    10. Agree Disagree

  10. The world is already overpopulated with humans; there is no reason to clone additional humans.


    11. Agree Disagree

When you have completed the survey, submit your answers to receive a summary of your results, or reset the survey to clear your answers.




Copyright ©2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies.
Any use is subject to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
McGraw-Hill Higher Education is one of the many fine businesses of the The McGraw-Hill Companies.