|
Interactive Lecture Notes
|
Return to Main Sneak Preview Page
| Interactive Lecture Notes |
|
Chapter 1: Understanding Our Environment
|
|
|
After studying this chapter, you should be able to:
- Define the term, environment, and identify some important environmental
concerns that we face today.
- Discuss the history of conservation and the different attitudes toward
nature revealed by utilitarian conservation and biocentric preservation.
- Briefly describe some major environmental dilemmas and issues that
shape our current environmental agenda.
- Understand the connection between poverty and environmental
degradation, as well as the division between the wealthy, industrialized
countries and the poorer, developing countries of the world.
- Recognize some of the reasons for feeling both optimistic and
pessimistic about our environmental future.
|
|
|
|

What Is Environmental Science?
1. Environment:
- From the French environner: to encircle or surround.
- The circumstances or conditions that surround an organism or group of
organisms, OR
- The complex of social or cultural conditions that affect an individual
or community.
Since humans inhabit the natural world as well as the "built" or
technological, social, and cultural world, all constitute important parts
of our environment.
2. Environmental Science:
- Systematic study of our environment and our proper place in it.
- Highly interdisciplinary, integrating natural sciences, social
sciences, and humanities in a broad, holistic study of the world around us.
- Mission-oriented, problem solving science.
- Seeks new knowledge about (and impacts of humans on) the natural world.
- Identifies solutions to environmental problems.
- These solutions often involve human social systems as well as natural
science.

A. Historic Roots of Nature Protection
Although many early societies had negative impacts on their surroundings,
others lived in relative harmony. Recognizing human misuse of nature,
however, is not unique to modern times.
Plato (4th century B.C.) wrote about how the people of Greece turned their
country into a "skeleton of a body wasted by disease".
"The problems that overwhelm us today are precisely those we failed to
solve decades ago." M.K. Tolba (199?), former Executive Director of the
United Nations Environment Programme.
Some of earliest scientific studies of environmental damage were carried
out in the eighteenth century by French and British colonial administrators
who often were trained administrators.
- Stephen Hales (British) -- suggested conservation of green plants
preserved rainfall (1764).
- Pierre Poiver (French) -- developed forest reserves on island of
Mauritius (1769).

B. Pragmatic Resource Conservation
George Perkins Marsh -- Man and Nature (1864)
- Warned of ecological damage from destruction of forest resources
- Establishment of National Forest Reserves (1873)
Theodore R
oosevelt and Gifford Pinchot (circa 1905)
- Framework for national forest, park, and refuge system.
- Pinchot promoted the conservation of natural resources to provide for
the "greatest good, for the greatest number (of people) for the longest
time".
- "The first principle of conservation is development and use of the
natural resources now existing on this continent for the benefit of the
people who live here now. There may be just as much waste in neglecting the
development and use of certain natural resources as there is in their
destruction". (Pinchot) [forest service approach]

Preserving nature on the basis of moral and aesthetic values has been
termed biocentric preservation
"The world, we are told, was made for man. A presumption that is totally
unsupported by the facts...Nature's object in making animals and plants
might possibly be first of all the happiness of each one of them. ... Why
ought man to value himself as more than an infinitely small unit of the one
great unit of creation?" John Muir, geologist, author and first
president of theSierra Club.
- Nature deserves to exist for its own sake
- National Park Service (est. 1916) approach
- Often at odds with Utilitarian Conservation approach of the Forest Service.

Modern industrial expansion and development of domestic and defense-related
chemicals during and after the Second World War created a new set of
environmental problems.
Rachel Carson ,
Silent Spring (1962), wrote about chemical pollution and the threats
posed to humans and other species.
Her warnings awakened the public and engendered a movement of
environmentalism, extending previous concerns to include both environmental
resources and pollution.
- Activists
- Litigation
- Intervention in regulatory process
- Use of mass media
- Promotion of scientific research
Environmental agenda has expanded to include issues such as:
- human population growth
- atomic weapons testing
- atomic power
- fossil fuel extraction and use
- recycling
- air and water pollution
- and others. . .

|
|
| The dawning of space-age travel and communications,
along with views of earth from space have allowed humans for the first time
to comprehend our planet as a global community with a unique life support
system.
View of the Great Lakes from the Space Shuttle
Endeavor
|
The movement of global environmentalism recognizes that we must be
concerned with the life support systems of the whole planet.
Leaders of this movement have been central in bringing global issues to the
forefront of the public's attention. The 1992 U.N "Earth Summit" was an
excellent example of international cooperation and awareness of the need
for global environmentalism.

A Marvelous Planet
We are fortunate to live in a beautiful, prolific, agreeable world. It will
take care and hard work to keep it this way.
We should ask ourselves: what is our proper place in nature? What
oughtwe do and what can we do to protect the irreplaceable
habitat that produced and supports us?
These are some of the central questions of environmental science:

Environmental Dilemmas
- Human population growth
- 6 billion now; as many as 25 billion within next century
- Can we support on a sustainable basis this many people?
- Food shortages and famines
- Water deficits and contamination
- Fuel and energy use
- Destruction of tropical forests, coral reefs, wetlands, etc.
- Loss of biological variety and abundance
- Toxic air and water pollutants
- Hazardous wastes
These and other similarly serious problems illustrate the importance of
environmental science and environmental education for everyone.

Signs of Hope
In spite of the seemingly overwhelming problems, progress has been made in
many areas that provide signs of hope for the future of our global
environment.

North/South: A Divided World
We live in a world of haves and have-nots; a few of us live in increasing
luxury while many others lack the basic necessities for a decent, healthy,
productive life.

World Bank Estimates:
- 20% of human population lives in acute poverty (70% of them are women
and children).
- Poor forced to meet short-term survival needs at expense of long-term
sustainability.

Generally, "environmental quality" is perceived as access to adequate diet
and housing, basic sanitation, clean water, education, and medical care.
In this case, then, the richest countries in the world have the best
environmental quality.

Rich and Poor Countries
Average Indicators for Quality of Life:
|
|
Indicator:
|
10 Poorest:
|
10 Richest:
|
|
GNP/capita
|
$170
|
$29,946
|
|
Life expectancy
|
47.4 yr
|
77.9 yr
|
|
Infant mortality
|
114/1,000
|
5.7/1,000
|
|
Child deaths (<5 yrs)
|
194/1,000
|
7.5/1,000
|
|
Safe drinking water
|
42%
|
close to 100%
|
|
Female literacy
|
38%
|
97%
|
|
Birth Rate
|
45.2/1,000
|
11.4/1,000
|
|
10 poorest: Mozambique, Tanzania, Ethiopia, Congo, Malawi,
Rwanda, Chad, Sierra Leone, Nepal, and Niger.
10 richest: Switzerland, Luxembourg, Japan, Finland, Norway, Sweden,
Iceland, U.S., Denmark, and Canada.
Source: World Resources Institute 1998-99.

Many of the poorest countries are those which have the highest levels of
cultural and biological diversity (i.e., have much natural resources to
protect).
The richest countries (highest "quality of life") consume the majority of
resources and produce the majority of wastes.
The United States (4.5 % of world's population):
|
|
Consumes:
|
Produces:
|
|
26% of all oil
|
50% of all toxic wastes
|
|
24% of aluminum
|
26% of nitrogen oxides
|
|
20% of copper
|
25% of sulfur oxides
|
|
19% of nickel
|
22% of chlorofluorocarbons
|
|
13% of steel
|
26% of carbon dioxide
|
|
Source: World Resources Institute 1998-99.

North/South Division
In large part the world is divided into North ("haves") and South
("have-nots").
Exceptions are countries like Australia and New Zealand ("haves"), and
India, China, and Baltics ("have nots").

Political Economies
- First World: industrialized, market-oriented, democracies of
Western Europe, North America, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, and their
allies.
- Second World: originally included centrally planned, socialist
countries, such as former Soviet Union and Easern European allies, as well
as several Asian socialist countries. Most are rapidly changing to market
economies.
- Third World: nonaligned, nonindustrial, ex-colonial nations
(eg., India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Iran, Syria, and many African countries)
self-labeled during the 1960's as third world to show independence from
other superpower groups. Typically used now to describe developing
countries.
- Fourth World: poorest nations with neither market economies nor
central planning, as well as the indigenous communities within wealthy
countries.

Human Development
United Nations Human Development Index (HDI)
Annual report that ranks countries based on many of the factors discussed
above.
- HDI ranges from 0 to 1.
- The top 20 nations (HDI >0.92) 18 are in North America or Western
Europe.
- Of the bottom 20 nations (HDI <0.35), 18 are in Africa.
- The lowest HDI was Sierra Leone (0.19).

Developmental Discrepencies
Aggregate numbers such as the HDI hide many important issues.
- Gender inequities
- Race disparities
- Regional / Ethnic differences

Good News and Bad News
Over the past fifty years in nearly all areas around the world there have
been significant improvements in the overall quality of life as measured by
HDI.
- Global GDP increased 10-fold
- Higher quality of life
- 1960 -- 3/4 of population measured <0.5 HDI
- 1999 -- <1/3 below 0.5 HDI
- incomes have doubled in developing countries
- malnutrition declined by almost one-third
- child death rates declined by two-thirds
- average life expectancy increased by 30%
- significantly higher access to safe drinking water
Nonetheless, the gap between the richest and poorest people worldwide has
also increased significantly.
- Income ratio between richest 20% and poorest 20%
- 1960 -- 30:1
- 1999 -- 100:1

Sustainable Development
Gro Harlem
Brundtland (Norway) Our Common Future (1987)
- "Sustainable development means "meeting the needs of the present without
compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs."

Can Development Be Truly Sustainable?
Relationship between sustainable ecology and sustainable economic growth
must be recognized. While economic growth makes possible a more
comfortable lifestyle, it doesn't automatically result in a cleaner
environment.


(1995 UN Summit for Social Development)
Goals:
- universal primary education (male and female)
- adult literacy doubled (females same as males)
- eliminate severe malnutrition
- availability of family planning services
- safe drinking water and sanitation for all
- credit for all
Estimated cost: $30-$40 billion per year
Suggested funding comes from the 20:20 formula:
- 20% of aid to developing countries to humanitarian needs (current: 7%)
- 20% of developing countries' budgets devoted to human concerns.

Indigenous People
Indigenous homelands harbor more cultural and biological diversity than all
the world's nature reserves. . .


Environmental Perspectives
"Answer me one question, are these the shadows of the things that will be
or are they shadows of the things that may be only?"
Question asked by Scrooge to the Ghost of Christmas Future
after seeing the disparity between the rich and poor of London (Dickens,
Christmas Carol)
What will be our environmental future and what can we do to shape it?
Think about the following worldviews and tactical positions as you proceed
through the rest of this course.

Pessimism and Outrage
We are faced by a number of very serious environmental problems. It is
easy to assume a grim view of our future and approach environmental
problems with pessimism and outrage.
Neo-Malthusian approach -- human nature will result in a dismal cycle of
overpopulation, misery, vice and starvation.

Optimism
Science and technology have provided many benefits to humanity; they also
have caused many difficulties.
Technological optimists beleive that human ingenuity and enterprise will
find cures for all our problems.

Questions for Review
- Define environment and environmental science.
- List six environmental dilemmas that we now face and describe how each
concerns us.
- Describe the differences between the North/South or rich/poor or more
developed/less developed nations. What do we mean by First, Second, and
Third World?
- Compare some indicators of quality of life between the richest and
poorest nations.
- Why should we be concerned about the plight of the poor? How do they
affect us?
- What benefit to us would there be in protecting the rights of
indigenous people?
- Give some reasons for pessimism and optimism about our environmental
future and summarize how you feel personally about the major environmental
problems that we face.
- Do you think that environmental conditions are better now or worse
than they were 20 or 100 or 1,000 years ago? Why?

Questions for Critical Thinking
- How could we determine whether the deformity of frogs has some grand,
global significance, or is merely a random, local event?
- What are the fundamental differences between utilitarian conservation
and altruistic preservation? Which do you favor? Why?
- Do the issues discussed in this chapter as global environmentalism
belong in an environmental science text? Why would anyone ask this question?
- Some people argue that we can't afford to be generous, tolerant, fair,
or patient. There isn't enough to go around as it is, they say. What
questions would you ask such a person?
- Others claim that we live in a world of bounty. They believe there
would be plenty for all if we just shared equitably. What questions would
you ask such a
person?
- Around 200 million children are forced into dangerous, degrading slave
labor each year. Is it our business what goes on in other countries?
- What would it take for human development to be really sustainable?
What does sustainable mean to you?
- Are there enough resources in the world for 8 or 10 billion people to
live decent, secure, happy, fulfilling lives? What do those terms mean to
you? Try to imagine what they mean to others in our global village.
- What responsibilities do we have to future generations? What have they
done for us? Why not use whatever resources we want right now?
- Do you see any similarities between current conditions and those of
the fourteenth century? Have we made any real progress or do things just
stay the same?

Return to Main Sneak Preview Page
Copyright ©2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. Any use is subject to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
McGraw-Hill Higher Education is one of the many fine businesses of The McGraw-Hill Companies.
For further information about this site contact mhhe_webmaster@mcgraw-hill.com.
or let us know what you think by filling out our site survey.
