Book Cover Economics 14/e   McConnell
Online Learning Center 

Chapter 24 - Pure Monopoly


Chapter 24 Outline McConnell and Brue 14th Edition

outline.jpg (40290 bytes)

 




1. Pure monopoly is a market structure in which a single firm sells a product for which there are no close substitutes. These characteristics make the monpoly firm a price maker rather than a price taker as was the case for the purely competitive firm. Entry into the industry is blocked and there can be nonprice competition through advertising to influence the demand for the product.
  • Examples of monopolies typically include regulated public utilities such as firms providing electricity natural gas local telephone service and cable television but they can also be unregulated such as the De Beers diamond syndicate.
  • While monopoly is relatively rare it is still important because monopoly firms account for about 5 — 6 percent of domestic output and it is useful for understanding the economic effects of other market structures – oligopoly and monopolistic competition – where there is some degree of monopoly power.
2. Pure monopoly (and oligopoly) can exist in the long run only if potential competitors find there are barriers which prevent their entry into the industry.
  • Four barriers that can prevent or restrict entry into an industry are
    1. economies of scale which makes one large firm the lowest cost producer instead of having many small competitive firms;
    2. legal restrictions through patents and licenses that give a firm exclusive right over the sale of a product;
    3. the ownership or control of essential resources; and
    4. pricing and other strategic practices such as price cuts advertising campaigns and producing excess capacity all of which can deter entry.
  • Entry barriers are seldom perfect in preventing the entry of new firms and efficient production may in some cases require that firms be prevented from entering an industry.
3. The demand curve of the pure monopolist is downsloping because the monopolist is the industry. By contrast the purely competitive firm has a horizontal (perfectly price elastic) demand curve because it is only one of many small firms in an industry. There are several implications of the downsloping shape of the monopolist’s demand curve.
  • The monopolist can increase sales only by lowering product price; thus price will exceed marginal revenue for every unit of output but the first.
  • The monopolist will have a pricing policy or is a price maker; the purely competitive firm has no price policy and is a price taker.
  • The monopolist will avoid setting price in the inelastic segment of its demand curve because total revenue will be decreasing and marginal revenue will be negative; price will be set in the elastic portion of the demand curve.
4.  The output and price determination of the profit-maximizing pure monopolist entails several considerations.
  • Monopoly power in the sale of a product does not necessarily affect the prices that the monopolist pays for resources or the costs of production; an assumption is made in this chapter that the monopolist hires resources in a competitive market and uses the same technology as competitive firms.
  • The monopolist produces that output at which marginal cost and marginal revenue are equal and charges a price at which this profit-maximizing output can be sold.
  • The monopolist has no supply curve because there is no unique relationship between price and quantity supplied; price and quantity supplied will change when demand and marginal revenue change. By contrast a purely competitive firm has a supply curve that is the portion of the marginal cost curve above average variable cost and there is a unique relationship between price and quantity supplied.
  • Two popular misconceptions about monopolists are that they charge as high a price as is possible and that they seek maximum profit per unit of output.
  • The monopolist is not guaranteed a profit and can experience losses because of weak demand for a product or high costs of production.
5. Pure monopoly has significant economic effects on the economy when compared to outcomes that would be produced in a purely competitive market.
  • The pure monopolist charges a higher price and produces less output than would be produced by a purely competitive industry. Pure monopoly is neither productively efficient because price is greater than the minimum of average cost nor is it allocatively efficient because price is greater than marginal cost.
  • Monopoly contributes to income inequality in the economy.
  • A monopolist may have lower or higher average costs than a pure competitor producing the same product would have.
    1. If there are economies of scale in the production of the product the monopolist is able to produce the good or service at a lower long-run average cost than a large number of small pure competitors could produce it.
    2. If a monopolist is more susceptible to X-inefficiency than a purely competitive firm its long-run average costs at every level of output are higher than what those of a purely competitive firm would be.
    3. Rent-seeking expenditures in the form of legal fees lobbying and public-relations expenses to obtain or maintain a monopoly position add nothing to output but increase costs.
    4. The monopoly market structure is not likely to be technologically progressive because there is little incentive for the monopolist to produce a new and more advanced product. The threat of potential competition however may stimulate more research and technological advances than would typically be the case but it is often designed to restrict entry and maintain the monopoly position.
  • The policy options for dealing with the economic inefficiency of monopoly include the use of antitrust laws and the breakup of firms the regulation of price output and profits of the monopolist and ignoring the monopoly because its position is short lived.
6. To increase profits a pure monopolist may engage in price discrimination by charging different prices to different buyers of the same product (when the price differences do not represent differences in the costs of producing the product).
  • To discriminate the seller must have some monopoly power be capable of separating buyers into groups which have different price elasticities of demand and be able to prevent the resale of the product from one group to another group.
  • The seller charges each group the highest price that group would be willing to pay for the product rather than go without it. Discrimination increases not only the profits but also the output of the monopolist.
  • Price discrimination is common in the U.S. economy.
7. The prices charged by monopolists are often regulated by governments to reduce the misallocation of resources.
  • A ceiling price determined by the intersection of the marginal-cost and demand schedules is the socially optimum price and improves the allocation of resources.
  • This ceiling may force the firm to produce at a loss and therefore government may set the ceiling at a level determined by the intersection of the average cost and demand schedules to allow the monopolist a fair return.
  • The dilemma of regulation is that the socially optimum price may cause losses for the monopolist and a fair-return price results in a less efficient allocation of resources.

HomeChapter IndexPreviousNext

Begin a search: Catalog | Site | Campus Rep

MHHE Home | About MHHE | Help Desk | Legal Policies and Info | Order Info | What's New | Get Involved



Copyright ©1998 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved.Any use is subject to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
McGraw-Hill Higher Education is one of the many fine businesses of The McGraw-Hill Companies.
For further information about this site contact mhhe_webmaster@mcgraw-hill.com.


Corporate Link