| |
| |
|
Economics, 15/e
Campbell R. McConnell, University of Nebraska, Emeritus
Stanley L. Brue, Pacific Lutheran University
Chapter 19 Disputes Over Macro Theory and Policy
|
|
|
|
 Origin of the Idea
|
|
Origin of the Idea
19.1 Monetarism
19.2 Equation of Exchange
19.3 Rational Expectations Theory
19.4 Efficiency Wages
19.1 Monetarism
|
As indicated in the text, monetarism descended from classical economics.
Today it is not seen so much as a distinct school of economic thought,
but as a subset of neoclassical economics. As the name suggests, monetarists
focused on the role of money in the economy. Earlier economists saw money
as a veil that must be pulled aside to see the real economy. Monetarists
helped demonstrate that monetary changes have real impacts, and are not
merely a cover for economic activity.
Some
of the better-known monetarists were Swedish economist Knut Wicksell (1851-1926),
Yale professor Irving Fisher (1867-1947), British Treasury official Ralph
George Hawtrey (1879-1975), and University of Chicago professor Milton
Friedman (b. 1912).
Perhaps the earliest monetarist, though typically not remembered as such,
was philosopher John Locke (1632-1704). Known more for his political philosophies,
Locke argued that the price level is determined by the quantity of money
in circulation, given a fixed quantity of real output and velocity of
money. Today referred to as the quantity theory of money, Locke’s contribution
is part of the foundation of monetarism.
|
Photograph courtesy of: (c)Corbis # BUS2016; |
19.2 Equation of Exchange
|
Irving Fisher (1867-1947) developed the equation of exchange within his quantity
theory of money. Fisher used the quantity theory of money and equation of exchange
to argue that "one of the normal effects of an increase in the quantity
of money is an exactly proportional increase in the general level of prices."(1)
In other words, the only effect of an easy money policy would be to cause inflation.
Fisher’s equation of exchange is a bit more complex than the version that appears
in the text. Specifically, when looking at the quantity and velocity of money,
Fisher separated currency (M) and its velocity (V) from checkable deposits (M’)
and their velocity (V’). This leaves Fisher’s equation of exchange as:
MV + M’V’ = PT
Fisher used T (for "Trade") instead of Q to represent the physical
volume of goods and services produced. As explained in the text, monetarists
believe that velocity is stable, an idea that originated with Fisher:
No reason has been, or, so far as apparent, can be assigned, to show why the
velocity of circulation of money, or deposits, should be different, when the
quantity of money, or deposits, is great, from what it is when the quantity
is small.(2)
Even if velocity is stable, it is possible, at least in mathematical terms,
that an increase in the money supply could increase real output. Considering
this possibility, Fisher responds as follows:
An inflation of the currency cannot increase the product of farms and factories,
nor the speed of freight trains or ships. The stream of business depends on
natural resources and technical conditions, not on the quantity of money.(3)
Thus with velocity assumed constant and the quantity of money unable to affect
real output, Fisher concludes that a monetary expansion will only yield increases
in the price level.
It should be noted that philosophers John Locke (1632-1704) and David Hume
(1711-1776) articulated notions of the quantity theory of money some 200 years
before Fisher would formalize the theory.
- Irving Fisher, The Purchasing Power of Money (New York: Macmillan, 1911),
p. 157.
- Fisher, p. 154.
- Fisher, p. 155-156.
|
19.3 Rational Expectations Theory
|
Milton Friedman of the Chicago school of economics (also known as new
classical economics) argues that people adapt their expectations (about
inflation, for example) as new events occur. One of the theoretical implications,
as explained in the text, is that in the long run the Phillips curve is
vertical. Another University of Chicago economist, Robert Lucas, along
with economists Thomas Sargent and Neil Wallace, extended Friedman’s analysis,
formulating the theory of rational expectations. Lucas, in his
Studies in Business-Cycle Theory, argues that economic participants
process economic information so effectively that they can predict and
respond to policy changes before they have an effect, allowing them to
act in a manner that negates the policy change.
Lucas
won the Nobel Prize in 1995 for his work on rational expectations, but
had to split the almost $1 million prize with his ex-wife, as stipulated
in their divorce agreement.
|
Photograph courtesy of: (c)AP Photo/Charles Bennett; |
19.4 Efficiency Wages
|
The notion that higher wages promote greater productivity - efficiency
wages - appears often in the history of economic thought. Although
not credited with developing the term, Adam Smith (11723-1790) was one
of the first to articulate the idea. Robert Owen (1771-1858), owner of
the New Lanark spinning mills in Scotland, attempted to put the idea into
practice. Owen, who owned and ran the mills from 1800-1820, also established
the model community of New Lanark. Operating during the industrial revolution,
a period in which wages were pushed to subsistence, Owen paid his workers
significantly more than the prevailing wages of the time, and his mills
were both productive and profitable.
Several
economists developed formal theories of efficiency wages. These theories
are summarized by George Akerlof and Janet Yellen, eds., in their book,
Efficiency Wage Models of the Labor Market (Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1986).
|
Photograph courtesy of: (c)Nance Trueworthy;
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright ©2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies.
Any use is subject to the
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
McGraw-Hill Higher Education is one of the many fine businesses of the
The McGraw-Hill Companies.
|
|