| |
| |
|
Economics, 15/e
Campbell R. McConnell, University of Nebraska, Emeritus
Stanley L. Brue, Pacific Lutheran University
Chapter 26 Technology, R & D, and Efficiency
|
|
|
|
 Analogies, Anecdotes, and Insights
|
|
Analogies, Anecdotes, and Insights
26.1 Copyrights and trademarks button
26.2 Trade secrets button
26.1 Copyrights and trademarks button
|
The board game Monopolyâ is an interesting
example of a patented, trademarked product that is still earning a substantial
profit after many decades. (1) The word "monopoly"
goes back hundreds of years, but Monopoly (the game) is the registered
trademark of Parker Brothers, now a unit of Hasbro.
The origin of modern Monopoly traces to Elizabeth Magie, a Quaker from
Virginia. She invented the game in 1904 to advance the cause of Henry
George, who advocated a single tax on land rent. Like Monopoly, Magie’s
game had forty spaces, four railroads, two utilities, and twenty-two rental
properties. The folk game was commonly played on the eastern seaboard,
particularly within Quaker communities. The streets in the game were named
after those between Inlet and Park Place, along the Boardwalk in Atlantic
City. (2)
In
the early 1930s, Charles Darrow of Germantown, Pennsylvania, copied and
commercialized the game, selling it through Philadelphia department stores.
Demand was so great that he could not keep up with the orders, so in 1934
he contacted Parker Brothers, a toy company, to see if they had any interest
in it. Parker Brothers initially rejected the game, pointing out that
it lasted too long, had rules that were too complicated, and contained
fifty-two fundamental design errors. But Monopoly continued to sell briskly
in Philadelphia. F. A. O. Schwarz, a New York toy store, ordered 200 sets
of Monopoly from Darrow.
Legend has it that a friend telephoned Sally Barton, the daughter of
the founder of Parker Brothers, to rave about a new game she had purchased
at the New York store. It was called Monopoly. Sally relayed the information
to her husband, Robert Barton, who was president of Parker Brothers. Barton
purchased a copy of the game the next day and ended up playing Monopoly
until 1:00 A.M. The next morning, he contacted Darrow and several days
later Darrow agreed to sell the rights to his version of the game in return
for royalties on each set sold.
Through copyright and trademark, Parker Brothers in effect gained a worldwide
monopoly on Monopoly (although "The Original Monopoly Game"
is an alternative (3)). Monopoly is available in 26 languages
in 80 countries and is the best selling copyrighted board game ever. More
than 200 million sets have been sold, generating more than $3 billion
of revenue for Parker Brothers.
- Maxine Brady, "The Monopoly Book:
An Authorized History," Internet; "Hasbro/Parker Brothers,
"Monopoly History," Internet; "History of Toys and Games,"
History Channel, Internet site.
- Ralph Anspach, the developer of the game
Anti-Monopoly—and later, the Original Monopoly Game—uncovered this history
of Monopoly (the game) in defending Anti-Monopoly in a court case relating
to Parker Brother’s trademark. See his The Billion Dollar Monopolyâ
Swindle (San Francisco: Anspach Publication, 1998).
- Ibid.
|
Photograph courtesy of: (c)Nance Trueworthy; |
26.2 Trade secrets button
|
Trade secrets have long played an important role in maintaining returns
from research and development (R&D). Long before Coca-Cola’s secret
formula or Colonel Sanders’ secret herbs and spices, the Roman citizen
Erasmo (c. 130 A.D.) had a secret ingredient for violin strings.(1)
As the demand for his new product grew,
he falsely identified his strings as catgut, when they were actually
made of sheep intestines. Why the deception? At the time, it was considered
to be extremely bad luck to kill a cat. By identifying his strings as
catgut, he hoped that nobody would imitate his product and reduce
his monopoly profit. Moreover, his trade secret would be preserved.
- We discovered this anecdote in Dennis
W. Carleton and Jeffrey Perloff, Modern Industrial Organization,
2d ed. (New York: HarperCollins, 1994), p. 139. Their source, in turn,
was L. Boyd, San Francisco Chronicle, October 27, 1984, p. 35.
|
Photograph courtesy of: (c)Corbis #11514490;
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright ©2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies.
Any use is subject to the
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
McGraw-Hill Higher Education is one of the many fine businesses of the
The McGraw-Hill Companies.
|
|