| |
| |
|
Microeconomics, 15/e
Campbell R. McConnell, University of Nebraska, Emeritus
Stanley L. Brue, Pacific Lutheran University
Chapter 17 Government and Market Failure
|
|
|
|
 Origin of the Idea
|
|
Origin of the Idea
17.1 Coase Theorem
17.2 Information Failures
17.1 Coase Theorem
|
The Coase Theorem originated with a 1959 article by Ronald Coase. The
article, appearing in the Journal of Law and Economics, drew the
attention of the editor, Aaron Director, and a number of well-known University
of Chicago economists, including Milton Friedman and George Stigler. Coase’s
article challenged A.C. Pigou’s analysis of externalities, which concluded
that government policy (for example, a tax) was needed to remedy spillover
costs and benefits. Though skeptical, the Chicago group was so fascinated
by Coase’s idea that they invited him to Chicago (Coase was at the University
of Virginia at the time). Coase convinced them that his analysis was correct,
and the following year Coase published "The Problem of Social Cost,"
an article that helped earn him the Nobel
Prize in 1991. In this article, Coase argued that externalities are reciprocal:
The [Pigou] approach has tended to obscure the nature of the choice that
has to be made. The question is commonly thought of as one in which A inflicts harm
on B and what has to be decided is: How should we restrain A? But this is wrong.
We are dealing with a problem of a reciprocal nature. To avoid the harm to B
would inflict harm on A. The real question that has to be decided is: Should
A be allowed to harm B or should B be allowed to
harm A? The problem is to avoid the more serious harm.(1)
To demonstrate what Stigler later termed "Coase Theorem," Coase
used the example of a cattle rancher and a farmer. The cattle stray onto
the farmer’s land and destroy crops. If the property rights are structured
such that the rancher is liable for the damages incurred by her cattle,
she will have an incentive to offer payment to the farmer for the use
of his land. If the farmer’s rights are protected, why would he negotiate?
Because if the payment from the rancher exceeds what he would have earned
growing crops, he will be better off allowing the cattle onto his land.
If, conversely, the rancher holds the property right and can graze her
cattle on the farmer’s land, the farmer may offer payment for her to stop.
If the farmer offers more than what the rancher loses by not grazing her
cattle on that land, the rancher will accept payment and move her cattle
elsewhere.
If property rights are clearly defined, the number of affected parties
is small, and the costs of negotiating are low, then according to Coase,
externalities can be eliminated through private bargaining, with no need
for government intervention.
- Ronald H. Coase, "The Problem of Social Cost," Journal
of Law and Economics 3 (October 1960) pp. 1-44.
|
Photograph courtesy of: (c)Nance Trueworthy; |
17.2 Information Failures
While information has always had economic value, George Stigler (1911-1992) was the one who brought it to the forefront of analysis. In his 1961 Journal of Political Economy article, "The Economics of Information," Stigler asserts that information is an economic good and, like all goods, consumers weigh marginal benefits and marginal costs to determine how much to acquire.
Educated at the University of Washington (B.B.A.), Northwestern University (M.B.A.), and the University of Chicago (Ph.D.), Stigler taught at Iowa State, Minnesota, Brown, and Columbia Universities, and eventually joined the famous Chicago school of economics. The Chicago school represents the more conservative mainstream in economic thought. As such, it is believed that free markets are the best mechanism for allocating resources, and that negative economic outcomes do not stem from flaws in the market, but from poor decisions made with faulty or incomplete information.
The adverse selection problem and lemon example comes courtesy of George Akerlof (b. 1940) of the University of California at Berkeley. As the lemon example illustrates, sometimes buyers lack information, leading to adverse selection. Sometimes sellers lack relevant information, such as insurance providers who lack full knowledge of their clients’ behaviors and probabilities of loss. In any case it is insufficient information that causes market failure.
| Photograph courtesy of: (c)Photodisc # BU002335;
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright ©2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies.
Any use is subject to the
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
McGraw-Hill Higher Education is one of the many fine businesses of the
The McGraw-Hill Companies.
|
|