|
Chapter 7: Objectives
Following are the main learning objectives from the chapter. To
help you coordinate your studies, these objectives are organized into sub-sections (7-1,
7-2, etc.) and listed with the relevant page numbers from the textbook.
7-1 (pgs. 197-204).
Understand that explanations are claims and not arguments.
- Understand the key difference between explanations and arguments.
- Be familiar with the four key reasons that explanations and arguments
get confused.
- Differentiate between explanations and justifications.
7-2 (pgs. 205-214).
Understand that explanations are best organized into three most common and important
types.
- Differentiate between physical, behavioral, and functional
explanations.
- Be familiar with the proper uses of each of these types of
explanations.
- Be familiar with the basic structure of each of these types of
explanations.
- Be familiar with the most common mistakes associated with each of
these types of explanations.
- Realize that more than one type of explanation may be offered for a
given phenomenon.
7-3 (pgs. 214-221).
Understand the criteria used to evaluate each type of explanation as good or bad, strong
or weak.
- Understand how to assess the criteria of testability when evaluating
an explanation.
- Understand how to assess the criteria of relevancy when evaluating an
explanation.
- Understand how to assess the criteria of freedom from excessive
vagueness when evaluating an explanation.
- Understand how to assess the criteria of reliability when evaluating
an explanation.
- Understand how to assess the criteria of explanatory power when
evaluating an explanation.
- Understand how to assess the criteria of freedom from excessive
assumptions when evaluating an explanation.
- Understand how to assess the criteria of consistency with
well-established theory when evaluating an explanation.
- Understand how to assess the criteria of alternate explanations when
evaluating an explanation.
7-4 (pgs. 221-224).
Understand how analogies can be used as explanations.
- Be familiar with the criteria for evaluating the strength of
explanatory comparisons.
|