|
McGraw-Hill Public Speaking
|
|||
| Locating and evaluating resources |
|
|
Special considerations for evaluating online resources Although the criteria for evaluating online resources are the same as the criteria for evaluating printed material, some areas deserve special attention. Certain problems, such as dubious authorship, are more likely to occur with online documents. Click one of the categories listed below or scroll down the page for additional information. AuthorshipIdentify the author. There are several places to check for authorship information.
To find author information in a source document:
If you cannot locate author information, the site should have a well-known sponsor.
Otherwise, it is not suitable as a source. If you do locate author
information, consider the credential of the author. Consider the credentials of the author. Anyone can write and publish a web page. You should only use information written by credible sources. Look for some of the following indicators:
SponsorshipIdentify the sponsoring organization. Different organizations sponsor
web sites. Standards exist for naming web servers and domains according to the
location and type of organization. The web address is known as an Uniform Resource
Locator or URL. The URL identifies transfer protocol, server name, domain name, and directory
information. Some sections contain valuable clues to the identity of the sponsoring
organization. Server names are often company or organization names. Some server names include
the www prefix, but that is not required when registering a server/domain name. Domain names identify either the country or organization type within a company.
Look for signs of organizational bias. Try to
determine the organization's motives in providing the web site. Many organizations have an
About Us or a Mission Statement link accessible from their home page. In some cases, it is
very easy to determine a company's position on a subject, such as the American Cancer
Society's position on smoking. If you're unsure about an organization, check out how they
identify themselves. Or, do a search on the organization name and find out what
other sources say about it. Is the organization selling a related product? Are they trying
to push legislative changes on your issue? Is it an informational site to promote
goodwill? Watch out for personal pages. Sites sponsored byknown
organizations, may host their employees', students' or subscribers' personal pages.
Although hosting sites have rules for publication, personal pages are not usually edited
and reviewed for accuracy.Learn to recognize personal pages and avoid using them as
sources. Clues in the domain name:
Clues in the directory path:
CoverageAnalyze level of detail and scope of coverage Material designed for online presentation often provides less coverage. The typical
computer screen displays only one-third as much information as a standard size typed page.
The online format affects the content found on many sites.
The end result? Many websites cover topics superficially. Often, youll find the
same main points listed at several sites, but none of them will contain supporting
material. Content clues in the site structure. You dont need to check
every page on a web site to figure out whether the site adequately covers your subject.
You should be able to find enough indicators on the top-level pages to anticipate the site
content. Most professional sites organize information in three areas of the screen. A
toolbar across the top of the page indicates the major divisions within the site. The
buttons or labels used to move between the divisions usually require little explanation.
Along the left side of the screen, youll find a set of links to items within the
currently selected category. A link label should contain enough information to give
you an idea of where you'll end up if you click on it. If you try two or three links
with unexpected results, the site may be poorly organized. At the top levels of a site, it is common to find links in bulleted lists that provide
access to other pages. The primary purpose of these pages is to help you get to the
content. An information-rich site usually contains descriptive headings that
indicate what you'll find at lower levels. When you click the link, you should feel
a step closer to your target. Select links that take you to lower levels of the site (links in the leftside column).
As you progress to the lower levels, you should find that the content area of the
pages contains more paragraphs of text than bulleted lists. Often, you'll find the
bulleted lists are main points with no supporting detail. While such sites may
provide an interesting overview or ideas for the main points of your speech, they don't
provide adequate coverage for a research project. Web versions of printed documents. Some of the most
information-rich sites provide access to longer documents previously published in paper
format. You'll see clues such as "web version of article . . ." or
"previously published" noted on the web page. When you select the page, it
may look like a table of contents. Links on the "table" take you to main
sections of the document. PDF documents. Another common method of distributing substantive material is through PDF files. You'll see instructions to "click here to download PDF version . . ." PDF stands for portable document format. Your machine must be equipped with the Adobe Acrobat Reader to view a PDF file. Portable document format allows organizations to convert lengthy documents from word processing, graphics, database and spreadsheet packages into something that can be viewed by most graphics-enabled browsers. Organizations use this method for several reasons:
References cited. Check for a bibliography, sources, or works
cited page. If you find one, check whether it includes only links to other web
sites, or if it includes printed materials as well. (Sources may also be cited at the
bottom of individual pages.) AccuracyResearch methods. Check for a detailed description of research
methods. Scientific or pedagogical studies should be supported by appropriate research
methods. Up-to-date links. Check that online resources listed as sources
lead to active sites. Most links referenced on a page should be active. Active links
indicate that the author of the site has chosen links carefully. They also indicate a site
that is monitored and maintained. Verifiable sources. Both online and printed sources should be
verifiable. Attempt to follow links listed as resources When broken links are
found, note whether they are broken links commonly found on similar websites or uncommon
links. Uncommon broken links probably indicate that the author has relied on
unstable sources. If too many broken links or untraceable printed sources are cited, do
not use the site as one of your sources. Source stability. Web pages are easily added, moved, changed,
and deleted. The page you reference today may not be on the web tomorrow, or may be in a
different location. Web authors are less likely to move or delete a page that is
popular. Try to use sources that you find in the link lists at several other sites.
Organizations, government entities, and academic institutions tend to set up long-term
sites. If a source contains information vital to supporting your main points, print out a
copy of important pages. Resource variety. The source should contain references to
printed materials as well as links to online resources. Not only does this show a
wider coverage of the topic, it indicates that claims made in the document have probably
been verified in more than one source. CurrencyCurrency refers to how up-to-date a source is. Check the creation and update
dates of the file. Most organizations list a copyright date on the the bottom of
each page. Some are more specific and include the last date the file was updated.
Use sources with current dates (usually no more than two years old). If you
are giving a speech on a rapidly changing field, sources should be even more recent
(within the past six months). Check the currency of sources used by sources that you want to include.If the
most recent information the source references is five years old, it is not current. You
may feel it is necessary to include or accept a resource that uses older documents that
represent a milestone in the subject area. For example, a speech on the problem of
encouraging minorities to vote might cite historical documents on the Voter Rights Act of
1965. However, current sources are needed to look at the status of the issue today. |
