The discussion of parenting styles can be enhanced by providing a two-dimensional framework adapted from the work of Slater (1962). Where a parent falls on the permissive-restrictive dimension in concert with where they fall on the warm-cold dimension may result in different types of behavior from their children. In a crude approximation to Slater's work, the following two-dimensional description is offered.
| Permissiveness | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|   | x indifferent |   | democratic x |
|   | x neglectful |   | permissive x |
|   |   |   | nonconformist x |
| Cold |   |   |   |
| Warm |   |   |   |
|   | x demanding |   | indulgent x |
|   | x authoritarian |   | protective x |
|   | x abusive |   | authoritative x |
| Restrictive | |||
A description of the four parenting styles defined in the text can come out of Slater's more comprehensive approach. Examples of the type of behaviors parents engage in should be numerous, and an emphasis on the behaviors of the children they parent might help bring the points home.
Disciplinary approaches are tied fairly closely to parenting styles, and could be presented at the same time. Parents using inductive techniques to discipline attempt to reason with their children and most often adopt an authoritative parenting style. This disciplinary style fosters compliance, encourages the development of empathy, and enhances self-control. Parents who use a power-assertive disciplinary style make use of physical rewards and punishment. They are most apt to adopt an authoritative parenting style, and their children are likely to behave when the contingencies are right but may not know how to behave when the reinforcements and punishments are not clear. Parents who use loss of love as a disciplinary style isolate or ignore their children when they misbehave. They are more likely to adopt a permissive-indifferent parenting style. The two styles together produce children who are anxious and uncertain.
Miller has proposed that the development from outsider to parent is a gradual process that varies with each child; Miller proposes that it takes as many years to become the parent as is the child's history with the initial, biological parent. Thus, a 5-year-old will develop a mature, parenting relationship with a stepparent by the age of 10. Miller proposes a three-stage growth for stepparents. Healthy relationships move from Guest (Courteous) to Friend (Sharing) to Parent (Intimacy). Unfortunately, the stepparenting stages can be negative and move from Intruder (Resentment) to Competitor (Hostilities) to Enemy (Hate).
In the first stage, being warm, friendly, and interested helps a new stepparent to be perceived as Guest and be treated courteously. However, negative personality characteristics, breaking "established'' family rules, or making rules and disciplining increase the chances of being perceived as an Intruder and being resented.
With time, the stepparent's status moves ahead into either a Friend or a Competitor. A friend is liked and trusted and is someone with whom to share. A "friend'' stepparent is listened to with respect but the children may still reserve some affection, keep some possessions private, and not want the stepparent in a lawmaking role. In the third stage of parent or enemy, the parent perceives the stepparent as a policy maker, comforter, disciplinarian, and emotional supporter.
Some stepparent relationships, however, are quite dysfunctional (The Hansel and Gretel Syndrome). Forty-three percent of all fatal abuse cases occur in the homes of stepparents. A child living with a stepparent is almost 100 times more likely to be murdered than a child living with two biological parents. Of 508 solved Detroit homicides in 1972, only 6 percent were committed by blood relatives, but 19 percent were committed by people related by marriage (e.g., spouses, stepparents, or in-laws). (Sources: Miller, D. M. 1984. A model for stepfamily development. Family Relations, 33, 365-372; Pringle, H. 1989 (December). The Hansel and Gretel syndrome. Omni, 38, 127.)
The text does a good job of describing the difficult balance of achieving independence in the turbulent period of adolescence when attachment to parents and relationships with peers are important. One important consideration in the success of surviving adolescence is the developmental stage the parents are in when their children hit their teenage years.
The typical teenager's parent is between the ages of 35 and 45. While their children are dealing with issues of identity and independence, parents are dealing with the very first stages of a mid-life transition. The parents may be struggling with career problems, marital problems, the beginning of some health problems, and emotional turmoil associated with reaching the halfway point to the end of their lives. How the parents cope with their concerns may contribute to the success or failure of their adolescent's adjustment.
Parents in their late forties and early fifties may actually be better prepared for the turmoil caused by the changes in their children. By 50, most parents have put to rest many of the issues surrounding the mid-life transition. The physiological changes in women are beginning to disappear or are becoming part of their identity. The psychological changes men undergo have just about run their course and the troubles associated with the onset of old age have not yet begun to take their toll. Parents may have the time and energy to be open to the needs of their adolescents during this period without having to deal with similar issues of identity and physical changes.
With more and more people waiting until their mid- to late thirties to have children, more and more people will be having teenagers when they are in their late fifties and even early sixties. While parents are dealing with the difficulties of chronic illness, the ends of their careers, and thoughts of retirement, they may not have the energy to guide their teens through the many changes they are experiencing. Teenagers will also have the added burden of dealing with the aging of their parents before they fully understand what it means to be an adult. The combination can make for a difficult transition; however, with open communication and an understanding of the developmental needs of both the teen and older adults, families can remain attached, and still encourage the development of independence.
Three types of childhood traumas are victimization, loss, and family pathology. Here is a brief introduction to each of these types.
I. Victimization
1. Impact
2. Recoil
3. Reorganization
II. Loss
Losses include apparent losses, changes, and unnoticed loss (marriage, achievements, and successes can be loss of an earlier life style). Losses include death, involuntary separation, or injury. It also includes divorce, moving, changing schools, leaving home, weaning, and puberty.
Kübler-Ross' stages of loss
III. Family pathology
Patterns of parental influence in children showing emotional disturbance: rejection, overprotection, unrealistic demands, overpermissiveness, faulty discipline, inadequate and irrational communication, and undesirable parental modeling
(Adapted from: Johnson, K. (1989). Trauma in the Lives of Children. Benton Harbor, MI: Hunter House.)
What can parents do to build good eating habits and good table manners with preschoolers? The suggestions provided here can build the foundation for years of pleasant and well-rounded eating:
(Sources: Leach, P. 1982. Your baby & child from birth to age five. New York: Alfred A. Knopf; Schuster, C. S. & Ashburn, S. S. 1986. The process of human development: A holistic life-span approach, 2nd ed., Boston: Little, Brown; American Dietetic Association, 1989. What makes Johnny Grow?)
Frank J. Sulloway suggests that most of the major innovators in science over the last 400 years are not firstborns. Birth order is the most reliable indicator of whether a scientist is for or against radical innovations. By looking at the birth order of 2,784 scientists who took sides during the 28 major scientific revolutions since the sixteenth century, Sulloway found that 23 of the 28 revolutions were led by laterborns. Moreover, firstborns with younger siblings were the least likely to accept new theories; next came only children; then laterborn eldest sons (those with one or more older sisters and at least one younger brother); and then laterborn only sons. The most radical scientists of all were younger sons with at least one older brother. (The major exception: firstborn Albert Einstein.)
In religion, the Reformation could be interpreted as a conflict between firstborns who typically supported Rome and laterborn Protestants. (The major exception: Martin Luther was a firstborn.) (Source: Woodward, K. L. & Denworth, L. 1990 (May 21). The order of innovation. Newsweek, 76.)
How parents make requests of their children and how they tell them about their behaviors has a big influence on parent-child communication. When parents (and other persons) give "you-messages,'' children (and other recipients) may feel "put-down.'' Examine these "you-messages'': "You are naughty.'' "You are acting like a little brat.'' "You are giving me a headache.'' "You know better.'' "You are doing way too much shouting.'' "You better stop that.'' "You are interrupting me.'' "Why didn't you put your clothes away?'' "You-statements'' come off as critical, powerful, and accusatory statements.
On the other hand, "I-messages'' are acceptable ways to simply and honestly talk about unacceptable behavior. Parents who use "I-messages'' communicate their feelings, criticize behavior and not the whole person, and allow their children space and responsibility to change the situation. Here's how "I-messages'' work: "I would like you to quiet down because I have a headache.'' "I would like you to stop running in the house.'' "I would like to finish this statement before you speak.'' "I get upset when you climb on the furniture.'' "I would appreciate your cleaning your room this afternoon.'' Authoritative parents tend to use a lot of "I-messages''; these statements allow parents to model expression of honest feelings, give reasons for requests, and limit criticisms to specific behaviors rather than focusing on you. (Source: Gordon, T. E. 1975. P.E.T.—Parent effectiveness training. New York: Peter H. Wyden, Inc.)
Here are five approaches that parents try to use to communicate love but which do not work (Hart, 1987) :
What communicates love? Taking children seriously and valuing their ideas and activities. Taking the time to listen to what they are doing, feeling, and believing. Helping children do things but not doing everything for them. These strategies express love and build self-esteem (Hart, 1987). Working on healthy communication helps children to feel support within the family, and allows them to feel good in their play activities and in their relationships with their peers. (Source: Hart, L. 1987. The winning family: Increasing self-esteem in your children and yourself. New York: Dodd, Mead & Company.)
The "potter'' has these beliefs:
The "gardner'' has these beliefs:
The "maestro'' believes:
The "consultant'' emphasizes:
The following family characteristics are associated with lower substance usage (Coombs & Lansverk, 1988):
How much do parents and their adolescent offspring talk? One study found that the total daily exchange of communication between parents and teenagers is less than 15 minutes—about 12 minutes to discuss schedules and chores and the remainder for personal exchange. A teen magazine poll of over 1000 teen girls found that fewer than one-third reported turning to their mothers for advice.
Can these statistics be improved? Parents can initiate changes by acknowledging their adolescents' feelings and opinions and valuing their children as unique individuals. They can also try the following basic aspects of true communication:
In addition to daily oral communication, some families incorporate family meetings, note-writing, and journals. (Source: Miller, M. S. 1989 (Oct.). How to talk to your teenager. Good Housekeeping, 251.)
Who's more permissive in parenting—middle-class mothers or working-class mothers? The answer depends on whether you are asking about today or pre-WWII. From 1930 until the end of WWII, working-class mothers tended to be more permissive than middle-class mothers. Since then, however, middle-class mothers have been more permissive than working-class mothers.
Working-class mothers place greater emphasis on conformity in their children than do middle-class mothers. Middle-class mothers are more concerned about the development of internal standards of control. Children of middle-class parents are likely to be punished on the basis of their intentions in the behavior; children of working-class parents are more likely to be punished on the basis of the actual behavior.
In 1980 Maccoby condensed all the research on the relationship between parenting and social class and found the following few SES (socioeconomic status) differences:
Maccoby found these social-class differences across race and culture in the United States. However, these SES differences are merely averages, and parents of both lower and higher SES levels exhibit a variety of parenting styles. Moreover, SES differences are diminishing, and not very large at this time. (Sources: Kohn, M. 1977. Social competence, symptoms and underachievement in childhood: A longitudinal perspective. Washington, D.C.: Winston; Maccoby, E. E. 1980. Social development: Psychological growth and the parent-child relationship. New York: Harcourt Brace; Bronfenbrenner, U. 1958. Socialization and social class through time and space. In E. E. Maccoby, T. M. Newcomb, & E. C. Hartley (Eds.). Readings in social psychology 3rd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.)
The Census Bureau says that 57 percent of all American women with children under the age of six are in the labor force. Twenty-eight percent of these children are cared for in their own homes (fifteen percent by the father, eight percent by a grandparent, two percent by some other relative, and 5 percent by a nonrelative). Thirty-seven percent are cared for in someone else's home (twenty-four percent are in a nonrelative's home and thirteen percent in a relative's home). Twenty-six percent are cared for in an organized child-care facility. Only eight percent are cared for by their mother at work
As a society that values children, it is interesting how little child-care workers are paid. Here are comparisons of weekly wages for jobs in 1992.
Child-care worker $154 Cleaning person $191 Cashier $219 Waiter/Waitress $222 Bartender $251 School teacher $561 Firefighter $636 Registered nurse $662A study conducted with 1,123 Canadian women by Ethel Roskies of the University of Montreal found that professional women who marry and have children are more content than those that are married professional women without children, who in turn were more satisfied than single career women with no children. The three groups did report equal levels of job satisfaction. The income of lawyers, engineers, and accountants were about the same for all groups but different for physicians. (Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, 1988 data. Gates, D. (February 22, 1993). Mary Poppins speaks out. Newsweek, 66-67; Study of career women finds children add to satisfied lives, Des Moines Register, November 22, 1992.)