Educational Psychology:
|
WHAT TEACHERS NEED TO KNOWWhen you first enter a classroom, you'll have already acquired considerable knowledge about the characteristics of students, how to teach, and what to teach. You have acquired this knowledge over many years from personal experiences and formal education. You need this basic knowledge the minute you enter the classroom, which isn't to say that you won't add to it as you gain teaching experience and probably take graduate courses to pursue your goal of being the best teacher you can be. Before we discuss the various types of knowledge that you need, remember that all of these ideas about children, about subject matter, and about teaching are filtered through your network of personal beliefs (Calderhead, 1996). For example, how do you think students learn? Your answer will have a lot to do with the methods and materials you select, as well as how you interact with your students. Do you have any underlying assumptions about teaching? For example, do you believe good teaching is a matter of presenting pertinent facts to students, or do you think good teaching is a matter of guiding students in their learning? Let's turn to some specific examples of the kinds of knowledge that teachers need and use in their quest for "good teaching," while keeping in mind the uniqueness of all the learners we might interact with in a classroom. As Alexander (1996) noted: One of the most powerful and consistent findings to emerge from the research in cognitive psychology over the past several decades is the realization that what knowledge learners possess is a powerful force in what information they attend to, how that information is perceived, what learners judge to be relevant or important, and what they understand and remember. Truly, one's knowledge base is a scaffold that supports the construction of all future learning. (p. 89) In analyzing the basic data teachers need, our first consideration should be the knowledge base of teaching. In a thoughtful essay, Good (1990) identified several topics with which you should be comfortable enough to use almost automatically in assessing your teaching. These include pertinent data from developmental psychology, motivation, classroom management, teacher expectations, and learning and learning strategies (topics that are at the heart of this book). If you are familiar with this rich teacher knowledge base, you can then use it while your lesson is in progress. For example, in the middle of your lesson, you might decide that things aren't going as well as you had anticipated and you determine that motivation may be the reason, or that the strategy you had decided on just isn't reaching your students. You can then make changes during the lesson. You can do this, however, only if you are completely at ease with your ideas about your students, about the subjects you're teaching, and the various ways of teaching. We'll use three categories to sort out the kinds of information you'll need to become an outstanding teacher: teaching (pedagogical) knowledge (managing the classroom, instructional techniques, etc.), subject matter knowledge (facts, structures, beliefs, etc.), and teaching subject matter knowledge (how you make a subject understandable to others). Teaching KnowledgeTeaching knowledge refers to how the basic principles and strategies of a subject are best acquired and retained. Some refer to this as pedagogical knowledge. Questions like the following are about pedagogical knowledge. Am I sufficiently prepared in this subject to know the best way to introduce it? What is the best way to teach its core elements? What is the best way to evaluate my students? To answer these questions, you must have usable knowledge about teaching, learning, and students (Borko & Putnam, 1996). Each of these three categories tells a story in itself, a story that helps to refine your personal skills. For example, classroom management is critical, but keep in mind that positive classroom functioning depends on many things, perhaps most importantly on your personality. What style of management are you most comfortable with? You'll soon discover what's best for you, and once that happens you'll steadily improve your management strategies. But, unfortunately, that's not your only consideration. You'll have to adapt to the philosophy of your school, and to the wishes of your principal, a very real force to be reckoned with. For example, in the course of writing this book, one of us visited a school where the principal casually remarked that when she went by a classroom, she liked to "hear the clock ticking." The management style in this school is quite different from that of another school in which the principal wants to hear the hum of activity as a sign of learning. Your task then is to keep a group of twenty to twenty-five students working together and focused on classroom tasks within the boundaries established by your unique personality, your students' needs, and the overarching philosophy of the school. Another aspect of teaching knowledge is that of instructional strategies, that is, how you structure activities in your classroom (Borko & Putnam, 1996). Although some teaching techniques will appeal more to you than others, you'll find that you need an arsenal of strategies to meet the widely varied needs of your students. At this point, you may well ask, "Why?" "Why can't I just use what works for me?" The answer to these questions cuts to the heart of what makes a good teacher. Different subjects demand different strategies; would you use the same methods for teaching algebra as you would in teaching Hamlet? Also, if you're to be a facilitator of meaningful learning for your students, you'll find yourself using many different approaches to reach them. Our final concern regarding teaching knowledge relates to learners and learning. As a result of observations and your own education, you no doubt have certain ideas about how students think and learn, and how you can use these ideas to further their learning. Students are active problem solvers who will take the data available, and with your guidance and their own view of the world will give learning their own interpretations based on your efforts, their personalities, their home situation, their friends, and their own personal bank of experiences. As you can see, this constructivist view of learning sees learning as a student-mediated process. We'll have much more to say about this process and the topic of constructivism throughout the book. Subject Matter KnowledgeSubject matter knowledge refers to a teacher's comprehension of a subject when compared with that of a specialist. How comfortable am I with this subject? Can I answer students' questions accurately and in a relaxed manner? For example, think of recent events that have captured our headlines:
On and on it goes, almost as if knowledge that has been forced below our level of consciousness has burst through restraining barriers and, as if to make up for lost time, has exploded before our eyes. Students, in the midst of this marvel of discoveries, have a unique opportunity to acquire learning that will shape their future as never before. We're not concerned here with how you teach a particular subject, but with your knowledge of the various subjects. Our focus is to urge you not to be content with the basic facts and information of a subject. Rather, acquire familiarity with the ideas, facts, and concepts of a subject, and how they are organized. In other words, know the basic ideas of a subject, and how these ideas are "put together." Try to keep up with the results of current research. What seems to be essential here is that you should know more than the facts of a subject; you should understand how facts and ideas interrelate, and what they mean for truly understanding the subject (Borko & Putnam, 1996). Does your knowledge of a subject affect how you teach it? Subject matter knowledge cuts both ways. If you feel shaky about material, you may attempt to brush by it quickly. Conversely, if you have depth of knowledge, you may do too much with your pupils. However, research indicates that knowledgeable teachers can better detect student difficulties and seize opportunities for meaningful learning. Teachers who are less knowledgeable in subject matter may avoid presenting critical material if they are uncomfortable with it, and thus their students will not see the whole picture (Dill, 1990). Nevertheless, it all comes down to one fundamental question: How much and what should teachers know of what they teach (Shulman, 1986, p. 26)? The best advice is to know as much as possible about your subject, to present it as dynamically as possible, and to be prepared to answer all kinds of questions about what you teach. Teaching Subject Matter KnowledgeTeaching subject matter knowledge refers to the most appealing manner in which you organize and present content-telling, guiding, and using texts, computers, media, or workbooks. According to Shulman (1986, p. 9), teaching subject matter knowledge means the ways of representing and formulating the subject that make it comprehensible to others, and an understanding of what makes the learning of specific topics easy or difficult: the conceptions and preconceptions that students of different ages and backgrounds bring with them to the learning of those most frequently taught topics and lessons. For example, assume that you are teaching one of Faulkner's stories and your students are having difficulty. What do you do? Do you yourself turn to the story and attempt to clarify themes, or do you search for an outside interpretation? To help you organize your thoughts about how to teach various subjects, think about the following questions that help to shape your personal style (H. Grossman, 1990):
|