Forward Thinking about Chapter 2
Whether intentionally or not, this chapter’s Mike Luckovich cartoon in
the paper version of Composing Cyberspace (p. 66) offers a male-centered,
sexist perspective on gender relations in cyberspace. This perspective
may be doubly disturbing to the extent that it both accurately and
inaccurately represents those relations. The cartoon’s decidedly male
viewpoint does reflect the history of the Internet, insofar as the
majority of participants have been men -- although recent surveys show
that women may compose as much as 40 percent of Net users, a proportion
thought to be increasing in the late 1990s. The fact that most people
with Net access are affluent and white is also reflected in the balding,
button-shirted, baby-boomer man in the left panel; perhaps he looks
slightly nerdy, too, conforming to a stereotype about
computer-industry workers who have participated heavily on the
Internet.
"Monique," however, grossly misrepresents the female online population,
which tends to be young or middle-aged and professional. Although the
exaggerated portrayal of "Monique" as a witch is obviously intended
as a joke, this caricature understandably might disturb people who
feel that women have already been marginalized with regard to high
technology (for example, several studies have shown that girls in
school are not offered the same encouragement to use computers as
boys). A woman successfully using a computer, we might conclude from
this representation, must not be "normal." Perhaps more disturbing,
the ugly witch has misled and manipulated the man, here portrayed as
the naive victim of her deviousness or desperation. Is the
presumably single "Monique" desperate for a man, or is she rather an
embittered, man-hating crone? Either way, the reality of gender
relations in cyberspace is much more complicated and interesting,
and this chapter explores that complexity.
Contrary to Luckovich’s portrayal of a hapless male, it is women who are
far more likely to be victimized on computer networks, where they have
routinely been the target of sexual harassment, come-ons, put-downs, and
bullying. To avoid such mistreatment, some women online pose as men or
use anonymous, gender-neutral names or character descriptions -- the
so-called gender-bending that Dale Spender examines in the
first selection. A relatively new phenomenon is male gender-bending:
Partly because so many women online may be using male names, it’s been
estimated that a high percentage of the "Moniques" in chat rooms,
MUDs
(text-based "virtual reality" spaces), and other electronic meeting
places are actually men posing as women. Writer Jesse Kornbluth
narrates his experience posing as "MsTerious" in an America
Online chat room in "(You Make Me Feel Like) A Virtual Woman." Time
magazine columnist Barbara Ehrenreich, in another America
Online chat room, encounters the aggressively seductive "Demonboy" and
finds the potential of cyberspace to overcome gender barriers unfulfilled.
Harassment of women online becomes most controversial in cases of alleged
"virtual rape," which raise complex issues about the power of language,
physicality, and emotions in electronic media. In a widely publicized
article in the Village Voice about a virtual rape in a well-established
MOO (another kind of MUD), Julian Dibbell thoughtfully
explores these complexities. Finally, Laura Miller critically examines the language used by Dibbell and other writers to
describe these rough-and-tumble virtual worlds, specifically the "Western
frontier" metaphor for cyberspace: Is the rush to "protect the women and
children" online, Miller asks, really just an excuse for increasing social
controls and decreasing freedom for all participants?
Before reading these selections, you might consider other questions
based on your own experience with gender roles and technology, such as
1. Have you ever not known the gender of a person you were talking with
on the phone? How did you react? How did you determine if the other person was male or female? Have you been in another situation where you were uncertain of, or mistaken about, a person’s gender? Share your experiences with classmates or fellow readers.
2. It’s been observed that, in our society, it’s more acceptable for
women to dress like men than for men to dress like women. Why do you
think that’s the case? In separate groups of women and men, discuss experiences when you’ve dressed up as or role-played the opposite sex, for example for Halloween, a costume party, or a drama performance. How did it feel to act as a member of the other sex? In what ways were you treated differently by others? Appoint a reporter to take notes, or record a transcript if you hold this discussion electronically. Then compare notes or share transcripts. What patterns, similarities, and differences can you observe in women’s and men’s experiences with this real-life "gender bending"?
3. Locate and study your school’s or company’s policy about sexual harassment, if it has one. Does the definition of harassment explicitly or implicitly include verbal or written forms? If you’re familiar with a sexual harassment case, think about the different forms the alleged harassment took or the different media in which it was expressed. Do you think that one medium is more "harassing" than another?
4. Locate and study your school’s or organization’s "acceptable use policy," if it has one, for the institution’s computer network. What uses of the computer network are forbidden at your institution? How reasonable does the policy seem to you? Have there been any cases of e-mail harassment at your institution?
5. If you have access to a computer lab, classroom,
or networked computers equipped with electronic discussion software,
hold a discussion in which everyone logs on anonymously with
gender-neutral names. Before you begin, make sure you agree on some
ground rules about netiquette or online politeness. Discuss one of
the issues raised previously or another topic suggested by your peers
or teacher. Afterward, talk face-to-face about the experience. Did
you try to figure out who was who? To what extent could you
determine who was male and who was female, and on what basis did you
make these judgments? Did anyone consciously try to disguise his or
her true gender? How successful was any such effort, and why?
feedback form |
permissions |
international |
locate your campus rep |
request a review copy
Copyright ©2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies.
digital solutions |
publish with us |
customer service |
mhhe home
Any use is subject to the
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
McGraw-Hill Higher Education is one of the many fine businesses of the
The McGraw-Hill Companies.