Ann Okerson,
"Who Owns Digital Works"

Ann Okerson is associate university librarian at Yale University, where her work includes making digital materials available to the library's users. Previously, she served as director of the Office of Scientific and Academic Publishing for the Association of Research Libraries in Washington, D.C. Since January 1993 she has been co-moderator of NewJour, an electronic mailing list that announces new electronic journal, magazine, and newsletter start-ups. This article first appeared in 1996 in Scientific American, a magazine addressing science and technology for a well-informed audience.

Ann Okerson's home page

"Who Owns Digital Works?" text


second thoughts

1. According to the article, how does the current debate about digital copyright fit into the larger history of copyright law? In light of that history, what aspects of electronic transmission, networking, and publication seem most problematic?

2. Okerson contrasts the reactions of information producers and information users to the Lehman Commission recommendations. What are the primary interests and motivations of each group regarding "intellectual property"? Within each group, how would you compare what's at stake for various subgroups mentioned by Okerson, or other interested parties you can think of? For example, among information producers, large corporate publishers and media producers would seem to have a much different perspective on copyright issues than individual scholars, writers, and artists. Or as an information user, how do your own interests in copyright relate to those of libraries, schools, or commerical Internet service providers?

3. How does Okerson try to present a balanced view of the digital copyright controversy? How successful do you think she is in striking this balance? How well do you think she represents "minority" viewpoints, such as those "who believe copyright protection has no future on the Internet" (¶ 31)?

4. How persuasive do you find Okerson's argument for a compromise solution that essentially duplicates the existing balance between public and private interests, or her hopeful "wait and see" approach to the future? Do you think such a solution sufficiently accounts for the changes in information distribution made possible by the Internet and other emerging technologies?



Chapter 8 index || Forward Thinking || Research Links || More Online Readings & Resources |

feedback form | permissions | international | locate your campus rep | request a review copy

digital solutions | publish with us | customer service | mhhe home


Copyright ©2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies.
Any use is subject to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
McGraw-Hill Higher Education is one of the many fine businesses of the The McGraw-Hill Companies.