Becoming Teachers, Administrators, Professionals: Issues of Concern to Future Faculty


by Jonikka Charlton
Purdue University



Ever since I started my last round of graduate study (I took a 3-year hiatus to run a writing center in between my master's and PhD), I have been preoccupied by issues of professionalization. I took a directed reading course just so I could learn more about it––how we define it, what people's attitudes are toward it, how we might make it a valuable part of our graduate education. It's not surprising that I'm interested in this issue as I'm getting ready to go out on the job market next year, but for me, thinking and studying about professionalization is about more than making sure I get a good job. It's about trying to understand the academic culture and my place in it. It's about trying to figure out what academics value, what the institution I'll be working in as a faculty member values, and how those values match up (or not) with mine. When I first began to investigate issues of graduate student professionalization, I was coming from a pretty good place. Both of my graduate institutions had done a good job of making sure I understood the academic world I would be entering as a faculty member. But I also knew that there were many, many other graduate students out there who hadn't been as fortunate as I had been. I wanted to figure out why some programs weren't doing as much as I felt they could—in fact, that they should––do to help graduate students learn as much as possible about what it means to be not only a member of a particular discipline, but of a department and wider university community. What I hope is that, more and more, graduate students and faculty have open discussions about what it is that's valued in the university and why and that we talk more about how we can learn to function successfully within the institution as future faculty members.

What I'd like to do here is share some of what I've learned in my work on professionalization and to invite you to join me in thinking through what it is that we want from our graduate education. Because of the numerous, very public “Johnny Can't Read” crises, a great deal of attention was paid to teacher preparation, particularly at the college level. That attention, though certainly uninformed, led to a really good thing––we now have many really good teacher education and mentoring programs in our graduate schools. It's time to turn our attention to academic and institutional culture as well. We shouldn't have to learn these other important aspects of being a faculty member “on the job.”


Responses to Professionalization

Academic Cliques

Job-driven Professionalization

Kinds of Professionalization

Professionalization and the WPA

 

Some Beginning Questions:

On Professionalization:

  • Is professionalization just job-driven, things we do to ensure a chance at a better job, or is it about something more? What might that “something more” be?

  • What were some of the more valuable professionalization experiences you have had in graduate school—both as part of the curriculum or extra-curricular? What have those particular experiences taught you about professional academic life?

  • What concerns do you have about becoming a faculty member? What do you not know that you wish you did?

  • What role do you think professionalization should play in your graduate education? How much time and energy should be devoted to it? Should it be a topic that gets covered in our classes, or is it something extra? At what point (if ever) do professionalization concerns take away from time spent learning the content” of your discipline?

  • What more would you like to see your own department do to help you learn how to become a successful member of your discipline and member of a university faculty? What more do you think organizations like CCCC, NCTE, or WPA could do?

  • For those of us interested in writing program administration, what kind of preparation would we like to see? What can we reasonably expect to learn while we're still in school?

 

On Tenure Expectations

  • Do you believe that tenure expectations have risen to an unreasonable level for new faculty?

  • Should the tenure system be changed? If so, how? How might the changes you propose change the institutional culture of universities?

  • How do you think tenure expectations (with pressure to produce more and more scholarship, serve the institution through advising and other committee work, teach as many as 4 courses per semester at some schools, and in some cases, serve in an administrative capacity) will affect your quality of life? How might these rising expectations affect your family life, community life, etc.?

 

Works Cited

Beginnings of a Professionalization Bibliography

Web Resources

Teaching Composition


Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. Any use is subject to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
McGraw-Hill Higher Education is one of the many fine businesses of The McGraw-Hill Companies.

If you have a question or a problem about a specific book or product, please fill out our Product Feedback Form.
For further information about this site contact english@mcgraw-hill.com