My Experience as a Protégé
by Stephanie MarcussiIt is difficult for me to fathom graduate students being given a teaching position with little to no experience as a teacher, let alone experience as a college-level professor. It seems that many universities are saying, "If you’re eligible for a Masters Degree, you must know enough to be an adequate teacher." While it may be true that the graduate students know plenty, it is not always true that they are or feel qualified to teach what they know. For this reason, I am grateful for my involvement with the program at CSU Hayward.
The invention of a teacher training program, or this organization we have been calling the "mentor/mentee" independent study, has only benefited me and my future students. Since I have had the quarter to observe Sue Connell in English 1001, and teach in her class, my thoughts and feelings about teaching have been altered. Although I have had many professors as a student in many classes, I have never before focused wholly on pedagogy. Previously I was more interested in learning the subject the professor was teaching; this quarter I have focused on teacher/student relationships in exchange of information, preparing lessons, and the grading process.
The teacher/student relationship is one that must be established from the moment the two meet. When the professor introduces herself and her ethos, it is understood that she will be guiding the class. From there it is up to the students to follow her lead. As a student, I have learned that this can be tricky to catch everything the teacher is saying; as a teacher, it can be difficult to ensure that the students are doing the catching.
For example, during the course of the quarter, I found myself introducing vocabulary and ideas that were sometimes very foreign to most of the students. The time that comes to mind is when I began talking about metaphors, and how I thought I should remind the students to use metaphors as an alternative way to describe objects or ideas in their essays. As I spoke, everything I said sounded so clear to me. I saw the students’ blank faces, and interpreted that to mean I was boring them. I thought they had probably heard all about metaphors before and had already mastered them. Realizing I was losing their attention, I stopped and asked a student to explain what a metaphor is. It was then that I realized she did not know, and no one else knew, either. The whole time I had been explaining it, I was using language that they were completely unfamiliar with. I learned that I should not overestimate the students’ base knowledge, and that I should include them more in the explanation of a subject to be sure they have an understanding of the concept I am teaching.
In teaching new concepts, I am more aware of how I plan my lessons. Leading the students in exercises, essays, and discussions should not be something that is considered "busy work." I caught myself wanting to do this occasionally, and then I had to ask myself, how is this immediately relevant to what the students are writing? I tried to find ways in which I could correlate an exercise around in something they would be interested. I realized they cared most about their essays, or writing that would be graded, so I incorporated lessons around revising those drafts. In "The New St. Martin’s Guide to Teaching Writing" by Connors & Glenn, this concept is validated.
If you wish to leave students with one strong idea about writing, you might choose to impress upon them the concept that writing is a process that always consists of drafting and revising toward the finished version. (127)
An example of this revision process includes my lesson on paragraph development. I not only reviewed the concept in class, but I allowed the students to revise the paragraphs in their rough drafts (before I collected them). By having their own writing in front of them, it was more relevant for them; they saw and corrected their own mistakes. Whatever I am teaching must be within the context of not only the course, but the context of what the students should be able to take away from having spent ten weeks in my class.
Because the ten week mark does end the quarter, there has to be some way each student can also mark his or her progress throughout the quarter. Unfortunately, as a teacher that means I have to assign grades. I feel bittersweet about having to do this because I saw students this quarter that progressed greatly, but when all the points were added up, they earned a "C" when their effort was deserving of an "A." Because grades are required by the university, they are inescapable; however, I have learned to let my comments speak louder than the grade. I try to present myself to the students as someone who can help them improve, rather than someone who merely grades them.
I have tried to incorporate all I have learned this quarter into my memory about teaching, but I realize that just as writing is a continual process of revision, so is my learning about teaching. In a way, I have gathered only a tiny bit of the art of pedagogy, and I will not be able to completely understand the teacher/student relationship, lesson planning, and grading until I have a class of my own. However, I do have a better idea of the process and flow of how a course operates. I feel I am better equipped to handle certain teaching situations because of my enrollment in the "mentor/mentee" program this quarter.
Works Cited
Conners, Robert and Cheryl Glenn, eds. The New St. Martin’s Guide to Teaching Writing. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 1999.
Copyright © 2000 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved. Any use is subject to theTerms of Use and Privacy Policy.
McGraw-Hill Higher Education is one of the many fine businesses of The McGraw-Hill Companies.If you have a question or a problem about a specific book or product, please fill out our Product Feedback Form.
For further information about this site contact mhhe_webmaster@mcgraw-hill.com