With a strong
economy, quality-of-life issues emerged as the top concerns of voters inthe
1998 elections. The Voter News Service (VNS) survey of voters on election
day found that 20 percent named education the most- importantissue, followed
by ethical standards (19 percent), the economy (14 percent), Social Security
(12 percent), taxes (12 percent), health care (7 percent) and the Clinton/Lewinsky
matter (5 percent). The results indicate that voters were concerned with
issues that affected their localities (such as education) or reflected
their own personal views (ethical standards). Most important, was that
the survey showed there was not one dominating national issue that affected
voter decision making. The fact that the Clinton/Lewinsky matter finished
last among the most important issues signaled that most voters wanted the
issue put to rest. With relative public satisfaction with the Congress,
the President and the economy, neither party advanced an agenda that would
attempt to transform the electoral dynamic because the risk seemed too
great.[10]
The quality
of public education has been a concern of voters for many years in light
of declining test scores and the ability for individuals to get ahead in
their lives. Republican members of Congress have urged that more money
be block granted to the states, that vouchers be given to parents to choose
a school for their children and that the federal government should play
a hands-off role in education. Democrats have argued for more money for
school construction, more teachers and lower teacher-to-student ratios
in the classrooms. Both parties have supported more rigorous testing of
public school teachers to ensure they are of the highest quality. The spending
bill signed by the President in October of 1998 gave Democrats a victory
in hiring a proposed 100,000 new teachers but did not provide significant
new increases in school construction. The voucher issue died in the final
version of the bill.
Voters were
not only troubled by the President's morality but their own. The Clinton/Lewinsky
matter may not have impacted decision making directly but it did heighten
the sense of moral and ethical standards. A CBS News poll in April
of 1998 seemed to capture much of this sentiment when respondents were
questioned. When asked whether they would lie about their child's age to
get a cheaper movie ticket: 28 percent would he, while they believed that
60 percent of others would do the same thing. Thirteen percent- said that
they would take "free" money from an ATM machine while they believed 55
percentof others would follow suit. Furthermore, there was a clear
generational difference--Gen- X respondents had less ethical qualms compared
to those over the age of 64 who had the most ethical reservations. In a
sense, the Clinton/Lewinsky matter was a symptom of a much greater concern
about the future of our society regarding how Americans viewed themselves.[11]
Gambling was
an issue with moral overtones that played an important role in Southern
gubernatorial elections this year. Democratic candidates for governor in
South Carolina and Alabama proposed legalized gambling to raise revenues
for their states. Both candidates, Jim Hodges of South Carolina and Don
Siegelman of Alabama advocated raising revenues through non-tax measures
to raise money for education. A similar initiative had been used successfully
by the Democratic governor of Georgia, Zell Miller, to fund among other
things, college scholarships. Hodges and Siegelman's opponents, incumbents,
David Beasley of South Carolina and Fob James of Alabama, both deeply religious
conservatives, opposed gambling initiatives because they felt it was repugnant
to their personal religious beliefs. The two incumbents lost in, perhaps,
the most religiously observant region of the country.
Campaign
Strategy and Tactics
The 1998 election
campaign was marked by the resurgence of the national parties in local
races. The two national parties raise what is known as "hard money" which
are contributions to advocate the election of candidates; and, "soft money"
which are contributions spent independently of campaigns to advocate issues,
register voters and get-out-the-vote activities. Both parties raised and
spent approximately $300 million by mid-October in "hard" money. Democrats
had also raised $78 million in "soft money," while Republicans had raised
$94 million. Much of the "hard" and "soft" money from both parties went
into issue advertising for candidates in states such as Wisconsin, Illinois,
California, Illinois, Kentucky, Nevada, New York, North Carolina and Nevada,
where there were very tight Senate races.[12]
The endgame
strategies of the Republicans and Democrats differed. Republicans had more
money to spend at the end of the election season and initiated the aforementioned
$10 million media campaign attacking President Clinton's moral credibility
to see how a national issue would play out in "Bible Belt" congressional
districts. Democrats, along with labor union allies, aggressively launched
and spent most of their remaining money on get-out- the-vote operations
to get Affican-Americans and union membersto the polls. In the
1996, labor unions concentrated more of their resources on media advertising
which was relatively unsuccessful. By contrast, in 1998 labor unions
utilized the bulk of their resources on get-out-the-vote operations which
have traditionally benefited Democrats more than the GOP. The reason is
that Hispanics, African-Americans and women who make up a large part of
the base of the Democratic party have lower participation rates than non-minorities
and men which make up a large part of the base of the Republican party.
An energized voting base in the 1998 elections helped Democrats
to do better than pundits expected, in large part, due to the coordinated
efforts of the national Democratic party, labor unions and state Democratic
parties.
President
Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton and Vice-President Al Gore campaigned extensively
for Democratic candidates. Mrs. Clinton was the most sought after campaigner
appearing in states such as California, Illinois and New York where there
were competitive senatorial and gubernatorial elections. Her efforts were
concentrated on trying to energize women to vote for Democrats. President
Clinton spent most of his time raising money for Democratic candidates
in the fall campaign. During the year, he appeared at over 100 fund raising
events. Finally, Vice-President Gore campaigned more extensively than either
the President or First Lady trying to elect or reelect Democrats across
the country, as a prelude to his run for the Presidency in the year 2000.
Media
Advertising
Campaign advertising
in the 1998 midterm elections echoed the tenor of campaigns of 19th
century campaigns--often personal and belligerent. Why? Because negative
advertising works more effectively by raising the negative attributes of
opponents and, usually, drives voters away from polling booths. No aspect
of someone's personal or public life was immune from attack. However, it
should be noted that the lack of decorum that appeared in 1998
was
tame compared to the presidential campaign of 1884 when Republicans accused
the Democratic nominee Grover Cleveland of fathering a child illegitimately.
Cleveland admitted he was the father. The Republicans campaign slogan that
year was, "Ma, Ma where's my pa? Gone to the White House, Ha! Ha! Ha!."
The Democrats labeled the Republican nominee, James Blaine, "The Continental
liar from the State of Maine." Cleveland defeated Blaine that year in one
of the meanest campaigns in history. [13]
The brutality
of media advertising grew as the 1998 election reached its last desperate
stages. Democratic Representative Charles Schumer traded barbs with incumbent
Republican Senator Al D'Amato of New York over who was more dishonest.
In Kentucky, Republican Congressman Jim Bunning running for an open Senate
seat ran what became known as the "Ride of the Valkyries" ad against his
opponent, Congressman Scotty Baesler, a Democrat. The ad showed Baesler
at a campaign rally thrusting his arm forward while music from the German
composer Richard Wagner (from which the ad gets its name) was playing in
the background. The ad hoped to evoke inferences of a Nazi salute and that
Baesler might have fascist tendencies. The ads backfired and turned a five-to-six point Bunning lead into a dead heat. Bunning eventually prevailed in a race that should not have been quite so close.[14]
In Maryland,
incumbent Governor Parris Glendenning (D) ran ads accusing his opponent
former state representative Eleanor Sauerbray (R) of being a tool of the
gun lobby and if elected would overturn state laws on protecting abortion
rights for women. Sauerbray stated throughout the campaign stated she would
not overturn any state law on gun control and would uphold any state law
protecting a woman's right-to-choose. [15]
Critics accused
candidates of appealing to the lowest common denominator and possibly driving
voters away from the polls. Candidates, for the most part, as noted earlier,
are first interest I ed in getting elected and many do not care about the
niceties of governing until after the campaign is over. However, as we
see today, so much damage is done during the campaign that it is not always
reparable once the governing process begins. This is one of the reasons
civility does not reign supreme in Washington today. One new media
technology being exploited in 1998 was the use of the Internet, Most candidates
for national public office had Web sites.
Some of
the Web sites even enabled browsers to watch campaign commercials on their
screens. Web sites were used as a means to solicit money, provide candidate
position papers on issues and as a way to attract volunteers to a campaign.
Because the Internet is still in its early stages of development, no one
is sure how the Web can be used most effectively by candidates.However,
the Voter News Service exit poll showed that 40 percent of voters use the
Internet regularly. Any serious campaign from now on will have to use the
Internet as a means to reach voters or risk ignoring a large population
at a relatively low cost.[16]